I wasn’t expecting any exciting discoveries when I clicked on one of my new Ancestry matches this morning.
We shared just 66 cMs, and she had no tree. What could I really hope to learn from looking at this?
I scrolled down this new matches’ shared match list. Wait. No. That can’t be right!
After seeing her first two matches, my brain lumped her into the paternal match bin. They were known close paternal cousins. But that third match – it was my maternal 2C, R.J.1, whom I’d just helped find his birth father. I know how he connects to me. He’s a maternal second cousin, descended from my great-grandparents, Francis Alvin VanLue and Elizabeth Jane Pettit’s son, Harry VanLue and his second wife, Dorothy Ritchey.
I doubled back. Neither my mom nor my sister, who have both tested at Ancestry, match this person.
But – R.J.’ s a proven maternal second cousin. Multiple shared matches and target DNA testing prove this. Could R.J. be a double match, with shared DNA from my dad’s side as well? Hmmm.
I drilled down deeper into new match, S.J.’s, shared match list with me. There were several other potential maternal matches, but they all linked to the same couple R.J. is descended from, and share just his paternal grandmother’s line. There were more of my paternal matches, first on my Gorsline/Clem branch, then, as the shared cMs became fewer, the shared matches trailed off into just Dailey/Majors, a line on my dad’s father’s side.
I was gobsmacked. If anyone told me R.J. and I connected on one of my paternal lines, too, I would never have guessed this particular branch. But indeed, it appears we very likely do share DNA from one of my ancestors on this line, in addition to sharing my mom’s grandparents’ ancestry.
I’m able to identify these connections quickly, because I use several tools to manage my Ancestry matches’ data. I use the MedBetterDNA Chrome extension to display my match notes on my main DNA match pages. I’ve coded my matches with colorful emojis that help me see at a glance how that match connects to me, if I have that information. And, I review all my 4C and closer matches.
I also keep a spreadsheet matrix of all my 4C and closer matches at Ancestry. The sheet shows who matches whom in vivid colors that make it easy to distinguish maternal and paternal matches at a glance.
I used Heirloom Software’s DNA Match Manager tool to export a CSV file, with my Ancestry matches’ user names. I built my matrix spreadsheet using this data.
And, I use DNA Painter to map chromosomes when I know what segments I match particular cousins on.
Or, where I THINK I match them.
This new match changes everything.
It means that segments I’ve mapped for my second cousin, R.J. are not necessarily what I thought they were. Since this match shows that he and I match on BOTH my maternal and paternal lines, I can no longer “assume” that segments I share with him are from a maternal ancestor!
This underscores Blaine Bettinger’s admonition to always compare complete trees before making genealogical conclusions. He’s shared his thoughts on tree completeness frequently in a Facebook group I belong to. I heartily agree with him. I practice this. I practice it religiously.
At least I thought I did.
My match with R.J. seemed like a “no brainer.” He shared DNA with a host of other cousins descended from my overachiever great-grandparents, Francis A. VanLue and Elizabeth Jane Pettit. Of course we shared maternal DNA.
We focused on finding his father, and in the process did identify his paternal grandmother. I pushed her line back a generation or so, to help when we sorted R.J.’s matches by whom they descended from. But that’s where I stopped. We found our match. We knew how we connected.
Or did we?
Turns out, we didn’t know all the ways we connected, and I now have more research to do, to decipher how his maternal grandmother’s line intersects my dad’s ancestry. And, I need to rethink my DNA Painter activities. For now, I’ll just keep this in mind, and watch for new match data to enlighten us on where we share the DNA from my dad’s side. (I don’t have access to my mom’s test results.)
And, I will be even more vigilant in comparing complete trees with my matches, and in documenting how I evaluated our match results, including how I compared our trees, searching for common ancestors.
I’ve decided to revive my Grandma’s Genes blog as part of Amy Johnson Crow’s 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks Challenge.
Though my research practices have improved dramatically over the years, I’ve done little to get my work “shareable” with family and the genealogy community at large. I hope working through Amy’s challenge will help me find a good format for sharing my work while challenging me to take my work to the next level.
I intentionally plan to give myself liberal leeway to skip here and there, as I already know life will get in the way.
Though this entry doesn’t exactly focus on a specific ancestor, it’s apropos for this week’s prompt: Surprise
1Names and initials have been changed to protect the identities of living people.